Many start-ups, scale-ups, SMEs and mid-size businesses choose to engage consultants rather than recruit employees. After all, this approach can offer some clear advantages for start-ups and growing companies, including:
However, this approach does not come without risk. This article highlights practical considerations to help both clients and consultants identify and mitigate those risks.
Generally, a Consultancy Agreement is suitable when the individual is a genuinely self-employed independent contractor engaged to deliver clearly defined services, deliverables or expertise. Engagements can be for a specific project, a fixed term or on a fractional (on-demand) basis.
Commercial risk, such as ownership of intellectual property, protection of confidential information and liability, can be addressed contractually; however, there is one simple but fundamental risk that shouldn’t be overlooked: labelling someone a consultant does not make them one.
If the working relationship resembles an employment relationship in practice, local employment laws may apply, potentially resulting in:
This is particularly important for clients engaging consultants across multiple jurisdictions, as misclassification can be costly and complex.
While there is no one single definitive test that can be applied across all jurisdictions to determine that a consultancy is genuine, there are a number of common, key factors, including:
Control & Autonomy
Working Arrangements
Financial Independence
Equipment & Resources
Commercial Terms
Professional Identity
Engaging consultants can be a flexible, cost-effective way for life sciences companies to access specialist expertise, especially when operating across multiple jurisdictions. However, misclassification risks should not be underestimated. Local employment laws vary, and getting it wrong can expose your business to unexpected liabilities, employment claims and reputational harm.
Robust, well-drafted templates are a simple but powerful tool to protect your business. They ensure clear terms on intellectual property, confidentiality, data protection and genuine independent contractor status. Importantly, they also enable non-legal teams to prepare agreements with confidence, reducing the risk of unintentional exposure or inconsistencies.
Practical steps such as using ‘front-loaded’ templates that lock down legal terms, template suites reflecting jurisdictional and contracting nuances with simple flow-chart guidance on which template to use, and version control and workflows leveraging SharePoint, can save time and money, and reduce risks.
Above all, keeping it simple and usable sets you up to scale effectively, maintain oversight and build trust with partners, investors and regulators as your business grows.
If you’d like practical, tailored advice on how to effectively structure and manage consultancy arrangements in your life sciences business, I’d be delighted to help.
Tina Durward is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 198068).
Paperweight Legal Limited (company number 14133395) is a limited liability company which is not regulated by the SRA.
© 2025 Tina Durward, Paperweight Legal Ltd - All Rights Reserved.