• Home
  • My Services
  • Client Portfolio
  • Matters
  • Life Sciences Insights
  • Contact Me
  • More
    • Home
    • My Services
    • Client Portfolio
    • Matters
    • Life Sciences Insights
    • Contact Me
  • Home
  • My Services
  • Client Portfolio
  • Matters
  • Life Sciences Insights
  • Contact Me

Which Transfers of Value (ToVs) made to Healthcare Recipients need to be disclosed?

It's a deceptively simple question - and one I'm often asked by scaling pharmaceutical companies entering into or expanding across Europe.

The challenge is that many organisations underestimate their Transfer of Value disclosure obligations under the EFPIA Code. A 'risk-based' approach may seem tempting, but it can create compliance risks, reputational exposure, and result in unnecessary costs further down the line.


In this article, I set out a practical example and explanation of which ToVs need to be disclosed, and why. I also look at practical steps to manage compliance in a way that is scalable, efficient, and realistic for growing pharmaceutical companies.


A simple scenario:


Size:

  • A scaling pharmaceutical company has secured its first product authorisation in Indication No.1.

Authorisations & Pipeline:

  • Marketing Authorisation has been granted in the EU (via the centralised procedure) and the UK.
  • There is an active pipeline with eligibility requests to be submitted to the EMA shortly for two further products and active clinical trials, both in set-up and ongoing.

Pricing & Reimbursement:

  • Pricing & reimbursement have been agreed for the first licensed product, and the company has active sales in Italy, Austria and the United Kingdom. 
  • Negotiations for pricing & reimbursement are ongoing in France, Poland, Spain and Switzerland, with the rest of Europe to follow in stages.


Entities within the Group are engaging and making ToVs to *Recipients across **Europe, including: 

1)   Contracting Healthcare Organisations and Healthcare Professionals to provide consultancy services (including Healthcare Professionals directly and via their Healthcare Organisations where required) - ranging from advisory boards to consultancy with respect to patient pathways and best clinical practice in Indication No.1;

2)   Holding and sponsoring Events, as well as supporting HCP attendance at Events; 

3)   Making Educational and Research Grants to relevant Patient Organisations; and

4)   Sponsoring global clinical development programmes.

Group Transfers of Value

Group entities

    So, which of these ToVs must be documented and publicly disclosed?

    OPTION 1:   ToVs made by Group entities to Recipients in Europe where those Group entities are members of National Member Associations;


    OPTION 2:  ToVs made to Recipients in countries where the Group has an entity that is a member of that country's National Member Association; or


    OPTION 3:  All ToVs made by all entities within the Group to all Recipients in Europe.

    The answer: Option 3:

    Why Option 3?

    It does seem to come as a surprise to some. I regularly hear objections, including:

    "But we're not paid-up members of EFPIA - that's for the big pharma companies"

    "We lack the resources to manage that - we'll have to take a risk based approach"

    "We simply aren't set up for that"

    EFPIA Membership explained

    EFPIA membership is composed of:

    1.  Associate Members; 

    2.  Members of Specialist Groups in EFPIA; and

    3.  Full Members.


    Full Members consist of Member Companies and Member 

    Associations. 


    EFPIA defines Member Associations as: 

    ".... any organisation representing pharmaceutical manufacturers at national level whose members include, among others, research-based companies. Collectively, the national Member Associations or their constituent members, as the context may require, are bound by the EFPIA Code."


    EFPIA Code

    As such, membership of a National Member Association makes you a Full Member

    - and therefore subject to the EFPIA Code.

    Group Disclosure

    The need for every entity within the Group to disclose the Transfers of Value they have made to Recipients in Europe is  captured in a key paragraph of the EFPIA Code - found in the introduction - which is often overlooked:  

    Managing your compliance

    For scaling pharmaceutical companies, ToV disclosure compliance does not need to be overly burdensome. With a strong foundation, a scalable and reconcilable solution can be achieved by leveraging existing tools, underpinned by legal oversight.


    Here are some practical steps that you can take:


    1)  Avoid silos

    Take a consistent approach to healthcare professional engagements and ToV compliance across your Group.  A straightforward way to achieve this is by using one central SharePoint Team Site across all entities in the Group.

    Employ visual guidance, training and playbooks at the source to support your internal teams engaging Healthcare Professionals contractually on a regular basis.  


    2)  Leverage SharePoint properly 

    Lists and workflows, when set up properly, can provide a scalable contract management system. This enables transparency and tracking of Recipients, payments and reconciliations with much greater efficiency. It is also valuable when it comes to your internal Healthcare engagement benchmarking oversight.


    3)  Engage the right internal stakeholders

    Ease of use is essential.  Involve key internal stakeholders early - such as your SharePoint lead, finance and the teams regularly involved in healthcare professional engagements. Their input will ensure that your solutions are practical and user-friendly.


    4)  Build a robust Template Suite 

    Maintain a standardised template suite within your central environment. SharePoint's underused (but incredibly valuable) functionality can ensure that all draft agreements are created using approved templates in a controlled setting, with proper legal oversight.

    Adding visual flow-chart guidance helps users select the right template quickly.

    The benefit of front-loaded, EFPIA aligned templates is twofold:

    • They map neatly to your tracking and reconciliation list exportable from your CMS; and
    • They give confidence to users, who only need to insert the commercial details, while compliance aspects are already built in.


    5)  Take control of your outsourcing

    As the client, ensure that your Master Services Agreement with any CRO is drafted on neutral and balanced terms. Don't be afraid to lead the narrative. A well structured MSA not only reduces operational friction but also safeguards compliance obligations.

    You remain responsible for disclosing ToVs made in the course of clinical research (albeit in the aggregate by country). To make this as easy as possible, make sure your CRO's responsibilities for collating and reporting these ToVs to you are defined contractually. Addressing this up front prevents out-of-scope issues later down the line.

    Managing compliance doesn't need to overwhelm your teams. 

    I work with scaling pharmaceutical companies to design lean, practical compliance frameworks that work with their resources and growth stage. 

    If your organisation is navigating compliant healthcare professional engagement and EFPIA disclosure obligations, I'd be glad to explore solutions that work in practice and are cost-effective.

    * EFPIA Code defines Recipients as: "any Healthcare Professional (HCO), Healthcare Organisation (HCO) or Patient Organisation (PO), in each case, whose primary practice, principal professional address or place of incorporation is in Europe."


    ** EFPIA Code defines Europe is defined as "those countries in which the EFPIA Member Associations' National Codes apply":  Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom (as at June 2019). 

    Tina Durward is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 198068).  

    Paperweight Legal Limited (company number 14133395) is a limited liability company which is not regulated by the SRA.  


    © 2025 Tina Durward, Paperweight Legal Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    • Privacy Policy

    Powered by

    This website uses cookies.

    We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

    DeclineAccept