It's a deceptively simple question - and one I'm often asked by scaling pharmaceutical companies entering into or expanding across Europe.
The challenge is that many organisations underestimate their Transfer of Value disclosure obligations under the EFPIA Code. A 'risk-based' approach may seem tempting, but it can create compliance risks, reputational exposure, and result in unnecessary costs further down the line.
In this article, I set out a practical example and explanation of which ToVs need to be disclosed, and why. I also look at practical steps to manage compliance in a way that is scalable, efficient, and realistic for growing pharmaceutical companies.
A simple scenario:
Size:
Authorisations & Pipeline:
Pricing & Reimbursement:
Entities within the Group are engaging and making ToVs to *Recipients across **Europe, including:
1) Contracting Healthcare Organisations and Healthcare Professionals to provide consultancy services (including Healthcare Professionals directly and via their Healthcare Organisations where required) - ranging from advisory boards to consultancy with respect to patient pathways and best clinical practice in Indication No.1;
2) Holding and sponsoring Events, as well as supporting HCP attendance at Events;
3) Making Educational and Research Grants to relevant Patient Organisations; and
4) Sponsoring global clinical development programmes.
Group entities
OPTION 1: ToVs made by Group entities to Recipients in Europe where those Group entities are members of National Member Associations;
OPTION 2: ToVs made to Recipients in countries where the Group has an entity that is a member of that country's National Member Association; or
OPTION 3: All ToVs made by all entities within the Group to all Recipients in Europe.
It does seem to come as a surprise to some. I regularly hear objections, including:
"But we're not paid-up members of EFPIA - that's for the big pharma companies"
"We lack the resources to manage that - we'll have to take a risk based approach"
"We simply aren't set up for that"
EFPIA membership is composed of:
1. Associate Members;
2. Members of Specialist Groups in EFPIA; and
3. Full Members.
Full Members consist of Member Companies and Member
Associations.
EFPIA defines Member Associations as:
EFPIA Code
- and therefore subject to the EFPIA Code.
The need for every entity within the Group to disclose the Transfers of Value they have made to Recipients in Europe is captured in a key paragraph of the EFPIA Code - found in the introduction - which is often overlooked:
For scaling pharmaceutical companies, ToV disclosure compliance does not need to be overly burdensome. With a strong foundation, a scalable and reconcilable solution can be achieved by leveraging existing tools, underpinned by legal oversight.
Here are some practical steps that you can take:
1) Avoid silos
Take a consistent approach to healthcare professional engagements and ToV compliance across your Group. A straightforward way to achieve this is by using one central SharePoint Team Site across all entities in the Group.
Employ visual guidance, training and playbooks at the source to support your internal teams engaging Healthcare Professionals contractually on a regular basis.
2) Leverage SharePoint properly
Lists and workflows, when set up properly, can provide a scalable contract management system. This enables transparency and tracking of Recipients, payments and reconciliations with much greater efficiency. It is also valuable when it comes to your internal Healthcare engagement benchmarking oversight.
3) Engage the right internal stakeholders
Ease of use is essential. Involve key internal stakeholders early - such as your SharePoint lead, finance and the teams regularly involved in healthcare professional engagements. Their input will ensure that your solutions are practical and user-friendly.
4) Build a robust Template Suite
Maintain a standardised template suite within your central environment. SharePoint's underused (but incredibly valuable) functionality can ensure that all draft agreements are created using approved templates in a controlled setting, with proper legal oversight.
Adding visual flow-chart guidance helps users select the right template quickly.
The benefit of front-loaded, EFPIA aligned templates is twofold:
5) Take control of your outsourcing
As the client, ensure that your Master Services Agreement with any CRO is drafted on neutral and balanced terms. Don't be afraid to lead the narrative. A well structured MSA not only reduces operational friction but also safeguards compliance obligations.
You remain responsible for disclosing ToVs made in the course of clinical research (albeit in the aggregate by country). To make this as easy as possible, make sure your CRO's responsibilities for collating and reporting these ToVs to you are defined contractually. Addressing this up front prevents out-of-scope issues later down the line.
Managing compliance doesn't need to overwhelm your teams.
I work with scaling pharmaceutical companies to design lean, practical compliance frameworks that work with their resources and growth stage.
If your organisation is navigating compliant healthcare professional engagement and EFPIA disclosure obligations, I'd be glad to explore solutions that work in practice and are cost-effective.
* EFPIA Code defines Recipients as: "any Healthcare Professional (HCO), Healthcare Organisation (HCO) or Patient Organisation (PO), in each case, whose primary practice, principal professional address or place of incorporation is in Europe."
** EFPIA Code defines Europe is defined as "those countries in which the EFPIA Member Associations' National Codes apply": Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom (as at June 2019).
Tina Durward is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 198068).
Paperweight Legal Limited (company number 14133395) is a limited liability company which is not regulated by the SRA.
© 2025 Tina Durward, Paperweight Legal Ltd - All Rights Reserved.